A New Concept for the Restoration Passport of Ceramic Cultural Monuments

Tatyana Nikolaevna Krasnova

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ija.20251301.15

Research Article |

| Peer-Reviewed

A New Concept for the Restoration Passport of Ceramic Cultural Monuments

Tatyana Nikolaevna Krasnova^*

Published in International Journal of Archaeology (Volume 13, Issue 1)

Received: 23 March 2025 Accepted: 7 April 2025 Published: 28 April 2025

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This article examines the challenges and nuances of managing restoration documentation for movable cultural monuments, particularly focusing on ceramic artifacts. The current system of documentation is critiqued for its lack of standardization and reliance on outdated practices that fail to meet the demands of modern restoration efforts. In response to these shortcomings, the author proposes a new, comprehensive model for a museum monument passport tailored specifically to ceramics. This model emphasizes the integration of detailed descriptions of technological characteristics, conditions of use, and types of damage, while also incorporating systematic monitoring to ensure ongoing preservation. The proposed passport model addresses the unique needs of ceramics, recognizing their typological diversity and the influence of factors such as production technology, environmental exposure, and usage history on their preservation. It advocates for a structured, questionnaire-based approach to documentation, which promotes clarity, reduces errors, and facilitates the standardization of terminology across restoration practices. The inclusion of schematic illustrations, classification data, and advanced technological descriptors enriches the depth of documentation while supporting easy digital integration for data management and monitoring. Central to the model is the prioritization of regular monitoring, enabling early detection of issues and timely intervention to prevent further degradation. The passport also incorporates provisions for documenting restoration efforts, including the analysis of previous interventions and their impact on the artifact’s condition. This systematic approach not only enhances the scientific rigor of restoration activities but also ensures the authenticity and historical value of the artifacts are preserved. Future research directions include practical testing and adaptation of this model for various types of movable monuments, fostering international collaboration and unified standards for cultural preservation.

Published in	International Journal of Archaeology (Volume 13, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ija.20251301.15
Page(s)	56-62
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Monument Passport, Museum Object, Ceramics, Restoration Documentation, Restoration, Monument Monitoring, Preservation Assessment

References

[1]	Приказ Министерства культуры Российской Федерации от 07.06.2016 № 1271 "Об утверждении порядка оформления и выдачи паспорта объекта культурного наследия (памятника истории и культуры) народов Российской Федерации" Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation. [Order No. 1271 of 07.06.2016 "On the Approval of the Procedure for Registration and Issuance of a Passport for Cultural Heritage Objects (Historical and Cultural Monuments) of the Peoples of the Russian Federation"] (Зарегистрирован 24.06.2016 № 42636) URL: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201606270009
[2]	Методические рекомендации по заполнению паспорта объекта культурного наследия. Приказ Росохранкультуры от 27 февраля 2010 г. N 27 "Об утверждении формы паспорта объекта культурного наследия" (зарегистрирован в Минюсте России 15 апреля 2010 г., регистрационный номер 16903). [Methodical Recommendations for Filling in the Passport of a Cultural Heritage Object]. Order No. 27 of February 27, 2010 "On the Approval of the Form of the Cultural Heritage Object Passport" Rosokhrankultura. (Registered in the Ministry of Justice of Russia on April 15, 2010, registration number 16903).
[3]	Иванова А. Н., Ларионова Ю. С. Пособие по методологии сохранности произведений живописи. [Manual on the Methodology for the Preservation of Painting Works]/А. Н. Иванова, Ю. С. Ларионова. – Санкт-Петербург: РГГМУ, 2021. – 68 с. http://elib.rshu.ru/files_books/pdf/rid_9820d4e82ab546dda2a145176ffb0a29.pdf
[4]	Лельчук А. И. Реставрация: реставрационный паспорт: учебно-методическое пособие. [Restoration: restoration passport: teaching aid] А. И. Лельчук; ФГБОУ ВО «Санкт-Петербургская государственная художественно-промышленная академия имени А. Л. Штиглица». — Санкт-Петербург: СПГХПА им. А. Л. Штиглица, 2018. — 52 с.: ил. ISBN 978-5-6040905-5-8.
[5]	Реставрация икон: Методические рекомендации. [Restoration of Icons: Methodological Recommendations] Под ред. и с ил. М. В. Наумовой.-М., изд-во ВXHPЦ. им. академика И. Э. Грабаря, 1993—VII, 226 с, ил.; табл. ISBN 5-7196-0757-9.
[6]	Реставрационный паспорт иконы. [Restoration Passport of Icons]. 2009 https://expertmus.livejournal.com/27911.html
[7]	Реставрационный паспорт иконы. [Restoration Passport of Icons]. Государственная полярная академия 2015 https://studfile.net/preview/3104397/
[8]	Щипина Р. В. Методика описания произведений декоративно-прикладного искусства в профессиональном образовании реставраторов. [Methodology for describing works of decorative and applied art in the professional education of restorers.] Манускрипт 2021, Том 14, выпуск12, С 2901-2905 https://doi.org/10.30853/mns20210452
[9]	Краснова Т. Н. К вопросу о ведении музейной и реставрационной документации. [On the issue of maintaining museum and restoration documentation.] Науково-теоретичні здобутки Слобідської України: філософія, релігія, культура. Збірка наук. праць за матеріалами Міжнародної наукової конференції, “4 слобожанські читання”. – Харків: Курсор. 2000. — С. 25-31.
[10]	Монастырев. М. М. Движимые объекты культурного наследия: особенности законодательного регулирования [Movable objects of cultural heritage: features of legislative regulation] Современное право,. 2015. № 6. С 66- 76 https://www.sovremennoepravo.ru/2/Monastyrev2-06.pdf
[11]	Международные нормативные акты ЮНЕСКО. [International normative instruments of UNESCO] М., 1993. pp. 368-376.
[12]	Федеральный закон № 73-ФЗ "Об объектах культурного наследия (памятниках истории и культуры) народов Российской Федерации". [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.zakonrf.info/doc-15548436/
[13]	Dante Abate. Documentation of paintings restoration through photogrammetry and change detection algorithms. Springer Nature Heritage Science. March 20192019(7:13). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-019-0257-y LicenseCC BY 4
[14]	Emma Vannini, Irene Lunghi, Emanuela Grifoni, Petra Farioli, Marina Ginanni, Andrea Santacesaria, Raffaella Fontana Three-Dimensional Analysis for the Documentation of the Restoration of an Earthquake-Damaged Triptych Heritage 2024, 7(4), 2176-2194; https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7040103
[15]	«Lecture: Conservation and Restoration Documentation as a Source in Architectural History. https://csms.columbia.edu/blog/2020/lecture-conservation-and-restoration-documentation-as-a-source-in-architectural-history
[16]	Maria Radin and Vesna Zivkovic. “Information Management for Preserving Cultural Heritage.” National Digitization Centre Review (2013): 22–32. http://eudml.org/doc/261326
[17]	Солдатенков Е. С. Цифровизация реставрационной документации в Русском музее. [Digitalization of restoration documentation in the Russian Museum.] Доклад на конференции "Нерадовские чтения", Русский музей. Санкт-Петербург, 2024.
[18]	. Кrasnova, T. N. [Study of types and causes of destruction of archaeological ceramics]. Aktualnaya Arkheologiya 5. St. Petersburg: Nevskaya Tipografiya Publishing House, 2020, pp. 107-109. Materials of the International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists; Institute of the History of Material Culture, RAS. St. Petersburg: Nevskaya Tipografiya Publishing House, 2020, 392 p.: ill.
[19]	Нарский документ о подлинности (Нара, ноябрь 1994) [Nara Document of Authenticity (Nara, November 1994)] Документ принят на XII Генеральной Ассамблее ИКОМОС (Мехико, октябрь 1999). https://ozlib.com/927199/iskusstvo/narskiy_dokument_podlinnosti
[20]	Краснова Т. Н. Реставрационная деятельность как фактор возможного разрушения археологической керамики. [Restoration activities as a factor in the possible destruction of archaeological ceramics] Журнал Института Наследия. – 2021. – №1 (24). URL: https://doi.org/10.34685/HI.2021.91.43.014
[21]	Краснова Т. Н. Понятие подлинности в контексте сохранения культурного наследия. [The concept of authenticity in the context of the preservation of cultural heritage.] Культурное наследие России. – 2022. – № 1. – C. 85–97. https://doi.org/10.34685/HI.2022.36.1.012
[22]	Краснова Т. Н. Актуальные вопросы сохранения археологической керамики. [Current issues in the preservation of archaeological ceramics.] Культурное наследие России. – 2021. – № 2. – C. 88–97. URL: https://doi.org/10.34685/HI.2021.9.43.014

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Krasnova, T. N. (2025). A New Concept for the Restoration Passport of Ceramic Cultural Monuments. International Journal of Archaeology, 13(1), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ija.20251301.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Krasnova, T. N. A New Concept for the Restoration Passport of Ceramic Cultural Monuments. Int. J. Archaeol. 2025, 13(1), 56-62. doi: 10.11648/j.ija.20251301.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Krasnova TN. A New Concept for the Restoration Passport of Ceramic Cultural Monuments. Int J Archaeol. 2025;13(1):56-62. doi: 10.11648/j.ija.20251301.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ija.20251301.15,
  author = {Tatyana Nikolaevna Krasnova},
  title = {A New Concept for the Restoration Passport of Ceramic Cultural Monuments
},
  journal = {International Journal of Archaeology},
  volume = {13},
  number = {1},
  pages = {56-62},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ija.20251301.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ija.20251301.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ija.20251301.15},
  abstract = {This article examines the challenges and nuances of managing restoration documentation for movable cultural monuments, particularly focusing on ceramic artifacts. The current system of documentation is critiqued for its lack of standardization and reliance on outdated practices that fail to meet the demands of modern restoration efforts. In response to these shortcomings, the author proposes a new, comprehensive model for a museum monument passport tailored specifically to ceramics. This model emphasizes the integration of detailed descriptions of technological characteristics, conditions of use, and types of damage, while also incorporating systematic monitoring to ensure ongoing preservation. The proposed passport model addresses the unique needs of ceramics, recognizing their typological diversity and the influence of factors such as production technology, environmental exposure, and usage history on their preservation. It advocates for a structured, questionnaire-based approach to documentation, which promotes clarity, reduces errors, and facilitates the standardization of terminology across restoration practices. The inclusion of schematic illustrations, classification data, and advanced technological descriptors enriches the depth of documentation while supporting easy digital integration for data management and monitoring. Central to the model is the prioritization of regular monitoring, enabling early detection of issues and timely intervention to prevent further degradation. The passport also incorporates provisions for documenting restoration efforts, including the analysis of previous interventions and their impact on the artifact’s condition. This systematic approach not only enhances the scientific rigor of restoration activities but also ensures the authenticity and historical value of the artifacts are preserved. Future research directions include practical testing and adaptation of this model for various types of movable monuments, fostering international collaboration and unified standards for cultural preservation.
},
 year = {2025}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A New Concept for the Restoration Passport of Ceramic Cultural Monuments

AU  - Tatyana Nikolaevna Krasnova
Y1  - 2025/04/28
PY  - 2025
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ija.20251301.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.ija.20251301.15
T2  - International Journal of Archaeology
JF  - International Journal of Archaeology
JO  - International Journal of Archaeology
SP  - 56
EP  - 62
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7595
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ija.20251301.15
AB  - This article examines the challenges and nuances of managing restoration documentation for movable cultural monuments, particularly focusing on ceramic artifacts. The current system of documentation is critiqued for its lack of standardization and reliance on outdated practices that fail to meet the demands of modern restoration efforts. In response to these shortcomings, the author proposes a new, comprehensive model for a museum monument passport tailored specifically to ceramics. This model emphasizes the integration of detailed descriptions of technological characteristics, conditions of use, and types of damage, while also incorporating systematic monitoring to ensure ongoing preservation. The proposed passport model addresses the unique needs of ceramics, recognizing their typological diversity and the influence of factors such as production technology, environmental exposure, and usage history on their preservation. It advocates for a structured, questionnaire-based approach to documentation, which promotes clarity, reduces errors, and facilitates the standardization of terminology across restoration practices. The inclusion of schematic illustrations, classification data, and advanced technological descriptors enriches the depth of documentation while supporting easy digital integration for data management and monitoring. Central to the model is the prioritization of regular monitoring, enabling early detection of issues and timely intervention to prevent further degradation. The passport also incorporates provisions for documenting restoration efforts, including the analysis of previous interventions and their impact on the artifact’s condition. This systematic approach not only enhances the scientific rigor of restoration activities but also ensures the authenticity and historical value of the artifacts are preserved. Future research directions include practical testing and adaptation of this model for various types of movable monuments, fostering international collaboration and unified standards for cultural preservation.

VL  - 13
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Tatyana Nikolaevna Krasnova

Graduate School Department, D. S. Likhachev Russian Research Institute of Cultural and Natural Heritage, Moscow, Russia

Contact Email

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7932-3886

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Krasnova, T. N. (2025). A New Concept for the Restoration Passport of Ceramic Cultural Monuments. International Journal of Archaeology, 13(1), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ija.20251301.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Krasnova, T. N. A New Concept for the Restoration Passport of Ceramic Cultural Monuments. Int. J. Archaeol. 2025, 13(1), 56-62. doi: 10.11648/j.ija.20251301.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Krasnova TN. A New Concept for the Restoration Passport of Ceramic Cultural Monuments. Int J Archaeol. 2025;13(1):56-62. doi: 10.11648/j.ija.20251301.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ija.20251301.15,
  author = {Tatyana Nikolaevna Krasnova},
  title = {A New Concept for the Restoration Passport of Ceramic Cultural Monuments
},
  journal = {International Journal of Archaeology},
  volume = {13},
  number = {1},
  pages = {56-62},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ija.20251301.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ija.20251301.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ija.20251301.15},
  abstract = {This article examines the challenges and nuances of managing restoration documentation for movable cultural monuments, particularly focusing on ceramic artifacts. The current system of documentation is critiqued for its lack of standardization and reliance on outdated practices that fail to meet the demands of modern restoration efforts. In response to these shortcomings, the author proposes a new, comprehensive model for a museum monument passport tailored specifically to ceramics. This model emphasizes the integration of detailed descriptions of technological characteristics, conditions of use, and types of damage, while also incorporating systematic monitoring to ensure ongoing preservation. The proposed passport model addresses the unique needs of ceramics, recognizing their typological diversity and the influence of factors such as production technology, environmental exposure, and usage history on their preservation. It advocates for a structured, questionnaire-based approach to documentation, which promotes clarity, reduces errors, and facilitates the standardization of terminology across restoration practices. The inclusion of schematic illustrations, classification data, and advanced technological descriptors enriches the depth of documentation while supporting easy digital integration for data management and monitoring. Central to the model is the prioritization of regular monitoring, enabling early detection of issues and timely intervention to prevent further degradation. The passport also incorporates provisions for documenting restoration efforts, including the analysis of previous interventions and their impact on the artifact’s condition. This systematic approach not only enhances the scientific rigor of restoration activities but also ensures the authenticity and historical value of the artifacts are preserved. Future research directions include practical testing and adaptation of this model for various types of movable monuments, fostering international collaboration and unified standards for cultural preservation.
},
 year = {2025}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A New Concept for the Restoration Passport of Ceramic Cultural Monuments

AU  - Tatyana Nikolaevna Krasnova
Y1  - 2025/04/28
PY  - 2025
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ija.20251301.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.ija.20251301.15
T2  - International Journal of Archaeology
JF  - International Journal of Archaeology
JO  - International Journal of Archaeology
SP  - 56
EP  - 62
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7595
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ija.20251301.15
AB  - This article examines the challenges and nuances of managing restoration documentation for movable cultural monuments, particularly focusing on ceramic artifacts. The current system of documentation is critiqued for its lack of standardization and reliance on outdated practices that fail to meet the demands of modern restoration efforts. In response to these shortcomings, the author proposes a new, comprehensive model for a museum monument passport tailored specifically to ceramics. This model emphasizes the integration of detailed descriptions of technological characteristics, conditions of use, and types of damage, while also incorporating systematic monitoring to ensure ongoing preservation. The proposed passport model addresses the unique needs of ceramics, recognizing their typological diversity and the influence of factors such as production technology, environmental exposure, and usage history on their preservation. It advocates for a structured, questionnaire-based approach to documentation, which promotes clarity, reduces errors, and facilitates the standardization of terminology across restoration practices. The inclusion of schematic illustrations, classification data, and advanced technological descriptors enriches the depth of documentation while supporting easy digital integration for data management and monitoring. Central to the model is the prioritization of regular monitoring, enabling early detection of issues and timely intervention to prevent further degradation. The passport also incorporates provisions for documenting restoration efforts, including the analysis of previous interventions and their impact on the artifact’s condition. This systematic approach not only enhances the scientific rigor of restoration activities but also ensures the authenticity and historical value of the artifacts are preserved. Future research directions include practical testing and adaptation of this model for various types of movable monuments, fostering international collaboration and unified standards for cultural preservation.

VL  - 13
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download